Search for: "Apotex" Results 401 - 420 of 1,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Apotex Inc., 2013 FC 751, Justice Snider held that Apotex must pay $119 million in damages for its sale of generic lovastatin, a cholesterol drug, which infringed one of Merck’s patents. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/qDmsnfGJFq -> Google reveals avalanche of link removal requests http://t.co/lWd2K4FgRa -> USPTO Again Rejects Apple’s Claim of Pinch-to-Zoom Patent http://t.co/YrME6CTcOi -> Four Tips from Merck’s $180M Patent Damages Win Against Apotex http://t.co/znvGmK3isO -> Google scholar link to FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/qDmsnfGJFq -> Google reveals avalanche of link removal requests http://t.co/lWd2K4FgRa -> USPTO Again Rejects Apple’s Claim of Pinch-to-Zoom Patent http://t.co/YrME6CTcOi -> Four Tips from Merck’s $180M Patent Damages Win Against Apotex http://t.co/znvGmK3isO -> Google scholar link to FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:43 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2010, GSK began manufacturing its own generic version that was distributed and sold by Apotex. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
-> RT McCarthy Tétrault’s IP litigators win more than $180 million judgment for Merck against Apotex for infringing Merck’s lovastatin patent -> Irish Supreme court dismisses copyright appeal in software infringement case, Koger v O'Donnell [2013] IESC 28 http://t.co/hXZOznIAct -> Japanese government considering copyright term extension http://t.co/5MI5RAuQOH -> What does Canada’s new anti-spam law mean for individuals and businesses? [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:35 pm by Aaron Barkoff
 The conference co-chairs are Shashank Upadhye, formerly of Apotex, and Kurt Karst of FDA Law Blog. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
 Further, Pfizer's claims as to what consists of evergreening should've taken into account their own experience in Pfizer v Apotex, when a US Fed Cir Court ruled that their claimed advantage of increased solubility and stability were not sufficient 'since it found the claimed advantage (better solubility and stability) to be fairly ordinary and the result of mere routine experimentation.' [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
CBT http://t.co/RMHJzziuWe -> Microsoft caves to Google, pulls YouTube app from WinPhone Store http://t.co/EQUYgmXgPw -> ADWEEK : “Ad Industry Takes Major Step to Fight Online Piracy”… Again… http://t.co/QMPu0LnEUa -> New way to profit from facilitating online piracy, offer a fee based Anonymous BitTorrent Client http://t.co/WhyWTUXOGr -> Fordham conference book published http://t.co/JOqAdJ48RY -> Royal Bank issues supplier code of conduct after outsourcing… [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Royal Bank issues supplier code of conduct after outsourcing backlash http://t.co/IkqEyAYBWF -> Sky apps targeted by Syrian hackers http://t.co/dkjfqhP7xm -> Google tells Federal Circuit what it actually likes about Judge Robart's FRAND rate ruling http://t.co/lElp55Av23 -> Report: EU Investigating Apple's Iphone Agreements with Mobile Operators http://t.co/cbB8DXbk3g -> The Next Big Bang in Kitchener-Waterloo http://t.co/HZgMpNqXEn -> User Generated Content Under Canadian Copyright… [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
Apotex Inc. et al. 3:13-cv-02801; filed May 1, 2013 in the District of Court of New Jersey • Plaintiff: The Medicines Company... [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:45 am by Eric Guttag
Sheridan) ruled against the company on the issue of patent infringement in its suit against Apotex Inc. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:29 am by Gene Quinn
.; Apotex Corp.; and Apotex, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for infringement of the reissue patent. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
Lilly successfully defended the validity of the patent against a wide-ranging attack by the well-known generic pharmaceutical manufacturer Apotex. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apotex, Inc., 480 F.3d1348, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:39 pm by Patent Docs
Apotex, Inc. et al. v. [read post]