Search for: "Bowling v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
Hansing, et al., 09-686). ** Whether a state-created corporation, set up to perform some public duties, shares in the state’s immunity to private damage lawsuits (International Shipping Agency v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
The fifth case the Court granted is Bowles v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:05 am by Kent Scheidegger
  CJLF wrote an amicus brief in this case supporting Texas.It was no surprise in the case of Moore v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
Recent Case The Illinois appellate court case of Bowling Green Sports Center v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
Recent Case The Illinois appellate court case of Bowling Green Sports Center v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
After some research in the matter, we believe a tie is not a loss, and Memon, survives another week.See, Bushel’s Case (1670) 124 E.R.1006; Bushel's case;  and Entick v Carrington [1765] 19 Howell's State Trials 1030. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
Special requirements for employees engaged on Federal or State contracts and grants The Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D) and the State Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 require that University employees directly engaged in the performance of work on a Federal or State contract or grant shall abide by this Policy as a condition of employment. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
New York City, 08-969), and a state legislature’s power to bar federal courts from ruling on class action cases that are based on state law claims (Shady Grove Orthopedic Association v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Secretary of the Army, 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:36 am by Ronald Levin
As she wrote, “[t]his Court alone has applied Auer or [its direct predecessor, Bowles v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 4:43 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit wrote a short gem of an opinion in Bowles v. [read post]