Search for: "C. C. v. State Department of Human Resources" Results 401 - 420 of 611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 4: IP Theory, Parlor BAnnemarie Bridy, Internet Payment BlockadesWikileaks: State Department publicly accused Wikileaks of violating US law; payment systems were suspended—PayPal, Visa, Mastercard. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 6:14 am by Robin E. Shea
Summers claims that he asked Altarum's human resources department about continuing to work from home while he received short-term disability benefits. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
When announcing the lawsuit, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employee Benefits Security Phyllis C. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Neil Cahn
Justice Cooper found the “de-chattelization” of household pets supported by the First Department decision in Raymond v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
There, Justice Elena Kagan explained that, with respect to a separate FOIA exemption for materials “related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency” under §552(b)(2): The use of the term ‘personnel’. . . connotes not that the file or department or practice/rule is for personnel, but rather that the file or department or practice/rule is about personnel—i.e., that it relates to employee relations or human… [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Pillard has argued nine cases before the Court, including the very significant successful defense of the Family and Medical Leave Act in the 2003 case, Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:25 am
Considering Certificates of Relief from Civil Disabilities, Certificates of Good Conduct or an Executives Pardon in determining eligibility for public employment Anonymous v NYC Human Resources Administration, 154 A.D.2d 233. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the… [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Discussion, research & resources Paul Bernal: A privacy friendly future? [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:13 am by jgconrad
Tamsin Maxwell presents her perspective of the state of legal search at the time. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury published final regulations (“Regulations”) implementing these new rules on December 6, 2012. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]