Search for: "Divine v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2011, 6:36 pm
By Daniel RichardsonTowslee v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
In Canavaugh v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:36 am
In County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm
Supreme Court has emphasized that “religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
”But the Constitution includes the amendment process of Article V, which has already been used to alter the scheme by allowing an income tax and eliminating the power of state legislatures to select U.S. senators.Add to this, judicial construction of the Constitution vastly expanding federal power in just the past 60 years. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
In State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am
And, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:09 am
Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:39 am
Arkansas and Kitzmiller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
The Vale of Glamorgan Council v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1532 (Admin) (16 June 2011): Council fails in challenge to closure if Barry Magistrates Court in Wales – wider victory for court closures plans. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
It lays down the fundamental structure and essential values of the state. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the local government in Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm
Giboney v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:55 am
While the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has declared that the term “sex” in Title VII includes transgender protection, that interpretation hasn’t been vetted extensively by the courts and may not be resolved until United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:38 am
The duel seems, thus, to serve the purpose of describing contradictory views on justice and on divine providence, purposefully failing to provide the audience to an answer for the question: “Who’s there? [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm
I’m talking about the latest case from the United States Supreme Court — Florence v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
(v. 1. of 1727 ed), Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2003653394/ Who was Dante Alighieri? [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:34 am
Supreme Court's ruling last year in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
