Search for: "Does 1-75" Results 401 - 420 of 4,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by David Friedman
It does not follow that the probability that the result was due to chance is only .25 since, in my simple example, that would mean a .75 chance that the coin is double headed. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Only those benefits specifically indicated in Section 125 are eligible for tax-free treatment.Revenue Ruling 75-539Revenue Ruling 75-539 addresses the constructive receipt rules with specific reference to plans involving benefits for accumulated sick leave. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
Thus, LV argued the ‘lv’ element is the predominant and most distinctive element of the Monogram canvas and is the element that consumers will immediately perceive and most easily remember.EUIPO and the intervener [s] evidently agreed with the approach taken in the contested decision and argued that the fact that the name Louis Vuitton or the Monogram canvas has a reputation does not mean that the earlier mark has a reputation. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Thus, for pleading purposes, the court ruled that the complaint need not specify the actual law, rule or regulation violated, although it must identify the particular activities, policies or practices in which the employer allegedly engaged, so that the complaint provides the employer with notice of the alleged complained-of conduct.The Court of Appeals observed that in order to recover under a Labor Law §740 theory, the plaintiff has the burden of proving [1] that an actual… [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Consideringthis evidence, the Examiner nevertheless concludedthat the claims were unpatentable over prior art.As to anticipationAll that is required to meetclaims 1, 2, 56, and 75 is one individual ammoniumpolymer compound within the claimed range, no matterwhat else is in the composition or how much of the molecular-weight distribution disclosed in Hassick overlapswith the claimed ranges. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:52 am
The $1 would be reduced to 50 cents during 2012. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:25 pm by Business Law Post
If it does, the credits will be allocated to eligible companies on a pro rata basis. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
" By this new formula, we have more poor older Americans, about 1 in 6. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
Judge Mason applied the following standards in reaching his determination: 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:17 am by CJ Haddick
Accordingly, we find that this form does not satisfy the requirements of  75 Pa.C.S.A. section 1734. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 2:42 pm by joseph
(Part 1) Buying Residential Real Estate in Ontario: What Does a Realtor do for a Buyer? [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:25 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The ruling does not mention evocation.According to the CJEU, Art. 13(1)(d) on misleading practices could be invoked to prohibit the reproduction of the shape or appearance characterising a product covered by a PDO. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 12:17 pm by Brett Trout
But what does that mean? [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 5:01 am by Unknown
Food items that are combined by the seller for sale as a single item except:1. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:42 am by Chris Kramer
There is a cap on BP’s liability for so-called ‘economic devastation’, at only $75 million. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:32 am by Ray Mullman
Those with income of 100-150% of the FPL receive 75% of the full amount. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:18 am by Jelle Hoekstra
With the statement setting out the grounds of appeal filed on 25 July 2016, the appellants submitted seven auxiliary requests.Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 differed from claim 1 of the patent as granted by the addition of expression "once a day" before the words "starting dose".Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 differed from claim 1 of the patent as granted in that the feature "dementia or Alzheimer's disease" had been… [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, said the court, “the conduct described in the charge[s] would not, if proven in court, constitute a crime," and thus "the statutory exception does not apply, and the charges are untimely. [read post]