Search for: "ERS Industries Inc."
Results 401 - 420
of 881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2014, 1:38 pm
Background This case involved a transaction between C&J Energy Services, Inc. and Nabors Industries Ltd. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:47 am
Bullock, the judge erred by adopting Dr. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
(C&J) and a division of Nabors Industries, Ltd. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:16 am
C&J Energy Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cisco Systems, Inc., 13-896; while the cross-petition Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
ISS Marine Services, Inc., 905 F. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:30 am
Er. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 4:45 am
Under the Bylaws, the GZDN “offers a location for a continuing diverse mix of light industrial, commercial, and office uses. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 4:45 am
Under the Bylaws, the GZDN “offers a location for a continuing diverse mix of light industrial, commercial, and office uses. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:23 am
Because the award to the Union was outside the scope of the issue the parties agreed to arbitrate and because the award does not draw its essence from the Master CBA, the Court hereby vacates the portion of the August 10, 2013 arbitration decision that awarded money to the UnionThe Court's decision in General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:30 am
Er. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
Moving Defendants’ argument — that the Court erred in Alkhas by applying forum non conveniens principles to decide the choice-of-law issue — does not change the outcome. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
MTD Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 am
©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
First American Title Insurance Company 14-106Issue: Whether federal due process requires state-court judges, in reviewing jury-awarded punitive damages for constitutional excessiveness, to: (1) use de novo review to set punitive damages at the level they find appropriate, without viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, based on Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
., Inc.Court: U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 13-1685 Judge: Selya At issue in this case was a popular restaurant in Puerto Rico owned by Lorraine Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
See CBS, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
Raymark Industries, Inc., 259 N.J.Super. 17, 611 A. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:38 am
The employer and employee agreed in February that the employer would pay the employee for any commissions based on a “protection list” of his former clients, as was industry practice. [read post]
