Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. US "
Results 401 - 420
of 1,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
Lee: The Supreme Court Case that Influenced the Play “A Raisin in the Sun” An Interview with Seongryeol (Ryan) Park, Foreign Law Intern Chew Heong v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
The plaintiffs held the position of “route salesmen” to “sell and distribute” products to customers in their homes. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity,… [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
Farah, Cancellation No. 92032341 [Section 2(d) Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark OMIC PLUS for cosmetics and skin care products based upon Petitioner's alleged prior use of the mark OMIC for cosmetics and skin care products].October 24, 2007 - 2 PM: Bose Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Ahmed v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:00 am
R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23-24 November 2015. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
As in Forby v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
Or might the negotiations come to reflect more deeply on the reasons for this prior record and move in a productive direction? [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:33 am
Carey summarised the Apple v Samsung saga and concluded that whether patentees could get a permanent injunction in the US was up in the air at the moment. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Code § 2511(1)(c); and using the contents of intercepted oral communications, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Whitman1 _ _ _ _ _ Ralph V. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
American Home Products Corp., 213 F. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[v] More than 50 years later, the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Pursuing a lead, police visited the home of Salinas’s parents, where he too resided, and received consent to search the home. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Cir. 2002); see also Home Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 6:51 am
In Green Technology v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:19 am
I would like excusive rights to your design unless we decide not to use it. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
The case involved a beautiful 15 year old girl permitted to use her “Uncle’s” Yamaha Waverunner XL800 while at the Easter party at his WPB waterfront home. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 8:42 am
BangladeshAsif Imran v. [read post]
