Search for: "In Re Proposals D & H" Results 401 - 420 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
Most proxy access bylaws address, in some form, the following issues:  (a) ownership threshold, (b) length of ownership, (c) maximum number of stockholder nominated candidates, (d) calculation of qualifying ownership, including treatment of “loaned” shares, (e) stockholder group limit, (f) maximum number of access nominees, (g) notice deadlines, (h) future disqualification of stockholder nominees, (i) voting commitments, and (j) third-party compensation… [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
We're for it, and I have every hope we're going to get that up and running this year. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
And the French civil Supreme Court, the Cour de Cassation, held that a corporation cannot be the author of a work protected by copyright: “une personne morale ne peut avoir la qualité d’auteur. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Third Circuit held that, under Pennsylvania law, a proposed renewal of insurance coverage must be reasonably consistent with the initial policy. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:51 pm
See the Borrower Credit Analysis Section of the HUD Handbook 4155.1 at Chapter 4, section C.2.h. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:14 am by Olivier Moréteau
De manière non exhaustive, des contributions dans lesdisciplines historiques, économiques, ou sociologiques sont également vivement souhaitées.Le comité scientifique se propose d'étudier les différentes facettes de l'arbitrage dans les traditionsreligieuses Hébraïques, Chrétiennes et Musulmanes, sans que cette proposition ne soit limitative enaucune manière. [read post]
”[18]  Although the class representative is required to provide an estimate of the damages and a proposal for how they would be distributed among class members,[19] it is ultimately up to the CAT “to give directions as to how each class member or represented person’s entitlement is to be calculated” by either “specifying a formula” or appointing an “independent third party to determine the claims or any disputes regarding quantification. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Katfriend Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot (Lumière University Lyon 2) tells all.* Money to burn? [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Especially because the proposed new subdivision (d) of § 15064.7 relies heavily on the rationale of the appellate decision in Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Among the categories of claimants who the Court said would not qualify for the presumption were those who sold because of “antitrust concerns”[23]—in other words, someone who disbelieved the “no merger” statements, but considered them immaterial, perhaps because of a belief that the government would not allow the proposed merger to proceed. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm by Schachtman
What is touching is that Beecher-Monas is sufficiently committed to gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony that she proposes a solution to take a complex area away from expert witnesses altogether rather than confront the reality that there is often simply no good way to connect general and specific causation in a given person. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Why do I say “re-set” rather than simply “cut”? [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lea Shaver, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Andrew Delaney
SCOV is puzzled—the statute doesn’t seem to require that notice also include a weather report on whether or not it’d be granted. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm by Jeff Vandrew Jr
In the past, if I had spent a large sum to expand my business into a new market and I missed my targets, I’d beat myself up about it. [read post]