Search for: "James v. Scott" Results 401 - 420 of 918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2016, 11:25 am
Weiss, Ethical Quandaries in War Zones, When Mass Atrocity Prevention Fails Mary Kaldor, How Peace Agreements Undermine the Rule of Law in New War Settings Rogelio Madrueño-Aguilar, Human Security and the New Global Threats: Discourse, Taxonomy and Implications Todd Sandler & Justin George, Military Expenditure Trends for 1960–2014 and What They Reveal Moira V. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Chief Cox designated Detectives Scott Alston, Michael McEwan and James Surdoval to perform such police patrol duties.* As a result, these detectives "work[ed] part of [their] normal work week, during [their] normal work hours, in uniform on patrol. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:13 am by Charles Mathis
In January of 2015, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey for Camden County issued their opinion in SAB Public Adjusters v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am by D. Daxton White
According to the SEC website, the following are xamples of SEC enforcement actions against Ponzi schemes: 2014 ·         Neal V. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, it was really not until the Dred Scott case in 1857 that members of the Court published historically important dissents. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The question of unions’ role in American life found its way into the Supreme Court earlier this month, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
James Ryan] Labeling sex offenders’ passports? [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
According to Lincoln, this conspiracy took form in the infamous 1857 Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]