Search for: "KLEIN V. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:35 am
You can sort through those at your leisure here.The Court also handed down several published opinions.Nicholas Klein v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:16 am
” “Anthony V. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:15 am
., et. al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Berge v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
Of particular interest to me was an argument based on the venerable-but-never-fully-understood United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
Speaking of five years, on the mop-up list, the Court GVR'd Klein v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:25 am
The environmental groups in the pipeline litigation have relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1872 decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
NSAACLU v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:57 pm
A Ninth Circuit decision supports the CBP’s position, holding that “reasonable suspicion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other electric device at the international border” (United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
” In Halpin v Klein, 62 AD3d 403,***** the employee was found guilty of administrative disciplinary charges involving absence from work based on records generated by global positioning equipment. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
In overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
In Bunt v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:04 am
First up is Perry v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston explains why a cert petition the justices will consider at their conference today, Klein v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
”Addressing the penalty imposed on VHB, termination, the Appellate Division said that “the penalty of termination is not excessive” and denied VHB’s appeal in its entirety. * See “letter of agreement” from NYC Department of Education Chancellor Klein to UFT President Michael Mulgrew dated April 15, 2010 concerning the processing and resolution of disciplinary charges filed against an educator employed by the New York City Department of Education pursuant… [read post]
