Search for: "LIVINGSTON v. STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am by Marty Lederman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Hall, Livingston & Newman, JJ.) heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm by Steve Statsinger
The court accordingly remanded for a de novo sentencing.United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
In another note of distinction, Secretary Cortés-Vázquez is proud to be the first Hispanic to hold the position of Secretary of State of New York. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by Giles Peaker
Following Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd (2015) UKSC 15: The objective – to restart an income stream from the property – was sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Steve Hall
That is according to attorneys who have asked a state district court to delay his death. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:18 am by B.W. Barnett
”To bolster its conclusion that questions 2-4 were unconstitutional, Justice Livingston's opinion cited the Supreme Court case of Minnesota v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Moreover, charities do not have the same resources as the state, so if the state is entitled to use bright line criteria for distribution of benefits, still more will that be true for a charity. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
The proposed federal criminal code drafted in 1828 by Edward Livingston—who had earlier participated in drafting the Louisiana Civil Code, was at the time a Congressman (and soon to be Senator) from Louisiana, and would later become Secretary of State—expressly covered "threats of withdrawing custom or dealing in business or trade … or any other threat of injury" aimed at influencing votes. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Judges Jacobs, Sack, Lohier, and Cabranes wrote concurring opinions, while Judges Lynch and Livingston dissented (Zarda v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by jamison
  This is the holding from Parsons v. [read post]