Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G."
Results 401 - 420
of 2,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Price v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
§ 1396r-8(g)(1)(B)(I). [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Additionally, there is the matter of timing. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 5:45 pm
Referring to its 2016 Grand Chamber judgment in Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am
” The subject retainer, standing alone, failed to resolve conclusively all questions of fact regarding the scope of the CMM defendants’ representation as to the subject matter of the third cause of action (see Cali v Maio, 189 AD3d 1337, 1338; Shaya B. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 5:42 pm
As a matter of logic and principle, it make [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
’ Therefore, the panel and board found that Mismas's alcohol dependency qualified as a mitigating factor pursuant to [Rules and Regulations] 10(B)(2)(g).Lake County Bar Association v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:49 pm
DeCaire v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
In Tagiyev and Huseynov v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Il ne pourra s'en distancer s'il l'a accepté (cf. toutefois ci-dessous in fine).Le plea est négocié, il constitue une forme de contrat et il est interprété selon le droit général des contrats. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Defendant requests that the State either produce or permit Defendant's attorneys to inspect and copy or photograph any relevant discovery as required by Rule 3:13-3, Rule 7:7-7(b) (Effective February 1. 1998), the Right to Know Law NJSA 47:1A-1 et seq. and the common law right to know under Shuttleworth v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division subsequently vacated the lower court’s ruling and treated the proceeding as if it had been transferred to it for a “de novoreview pursuant to CPLR 7804(g),” explaining that Durudogan petition had raised an issue of substantial evidence and should have been initially so transferred to it.Reviewing the matter de novo, the Appellate Division found that substantial evidence supported the City’s determination that… [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:12 pm
§ § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2)); see also United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
The reasons for revocation are limited to added subject-matter in respect of granted claim 1 (alternative claims submitted during the hearing by Nestec were not admitted into the proceedings). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Hawk Valley, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:50 am
The court also noted that it could, under Rule 23(g)(1)(B), consider “any . . . matter pertinent to counsel’s ability to fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
Skipper, Brett G. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:36 am
S. _ (2010); Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
Nonetheless, Supreme Court's reduction to $30 weekly was excessive and, it found $150 per week to be "just and appropriate" under the circumstances present here (Domestic Relations Law §240[1-b][g] ). [read post]
