Search for: "Medina v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Justice Eva Guzman delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice David Medina and Justice Willett joined. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:10 pm
Shariah Inheritance V. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 2:56 am
In settling EEOC v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:56 pm
S___ K___ v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:58 am
., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
Berry posts a thoughtful review of the ruling in MySpace v GraphOn for PatLit, while the jiplp weblog proudly announces the publication of the special Geographical Indications issue of JIPLP, complete with editorial by guest editors Miguel Ángel Medina González (Elzaburu, Spain) and Keri Johnston (Johnston & Wassenaar, Toronto). [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
(Tex. 2009) follows: Justice O’Neill, joined by Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Medina, and Justice Green, dissenting.I agree that trial courts should not set aside jury verdicts without valid reasons. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am
If you text the word invite, I‑N‑V‑I‑T‑E, we’ll know about that. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Medina v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
., P.A. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne)Thursday, March 29, 4:30 pm"Breaking Developments in International Law: Conversation on ICJ's Opinion in Bosnia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
Medina, P. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
Only Medina - who has personal concerns more serious than reelection - turned in fewer than Wainwright. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Medina, and M. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
I said their commercials usually misrepresent the present state of tax collection, with remarks like “The IRS is coming down harder than before. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations… [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm
In Sheppard v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
