Search for: "Novelty, Inc." Results 401 - 420 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
Nearly a year ago this Kat reported on Regeneron Pharmacueticals Inc and Bayer AG v Genentech Inc [2012] EWHC 657 (see BAILII).Cat's eye does not suffer from macular degeneration Nearly a year on, and we are treated to the Court of Appeal consideration of the matter, which hit the streets yesterday, and which you can also read on BAILII. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The patent proprietor later withdrew its appeal.Claim 1 on file was directed at a stable enzyme composition comprising a thermostable nucleic acid polymerase enzyme in a buffer comprising one or more non-ionic polymeric detergents.When dealing with novelty of the claimed subject-matter, the Board had to decide on document N2. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 276080 (Fed. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
Unless Apple can convince the appeals court that the patent is indefinite as the judge originally thought, validity is a question of non-novelty or obviousness in light of prior art. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cellpro Inc., 152 F.3d 1342, 1361 (Fed. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
This scheme relies on the author to promote the progress of science by permitting him to control the cost of and access to his novelty.3 Other courts have reiterated the public’s benefit from copyright law, especially when considering preliminary injunctions (since the public interest must be considered when deciding to issue a preliminary injunction). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
This scheme relies on the author to promote the progress of science by permitting him to control the cost of and access to his novelty.3 Other courts have reiterated the public’s benefit from copyright law, especially when considering preliminary injunctions (since the public interest must be considered when deciding to issue a preliminary injunction). [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 10:47 am by blaisemouttet
The basic claimed structure was already described back in 1988 by a company called Maxdem Inc. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Novelty, Inc., 482 F.3d 910, 914 (7th Cir. 2007). [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
 The BA First bed only extended in the pink and was therefore not novelty destroying. [read post]