Search for: "ROBERT W POWERS"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2020, 10:25 pm
Chapman & Michael W. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Larry Catá Backer W. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
City of Charleston, in an opinion by Judge Robert King, joined by Judges J. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:10 am
O’Brien said “The ICC’s effort to target American servicemen and women and other public servants are unfounded, illegitimate, and make a mockery of justice”.[6] Barr stated “(w)e are concerned that foreign powers, like Russia, are also manipulating the ICC in pursuit of their own agenda. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:10 am
O’Brien said “The ICC’s effort to target American servicemen and women and other public servants are unfounded, illegitimate, and make a mockery of justice”.[6] Barr stated “(w)e are concerned that foreign powers, like Russia, are also manipulating the ICC in pursuit of their own agenda. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
Lilly and Peter W. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Although such licensure suspensions or revocations for “testimonial misadventures” remain rare, the Lustgarten case illustrates that Medical Boards have the power to police medico-legal testimony.[4] Medical societies, although voluntary, may have considerable influence on teaching and hospital privileges and positions. [read post]
23 May 2020, 5:38 pm
" … [W]here a regulation's operative language restricts conduct by explicit reference to the conduct's religious character, it is not facially neutral. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
When Letter responded that Congress’ legislative power is “extremely broad,” Roberts shot back that the House’s test “is not really much of a test. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Justia’s Verdict blog, Rodger Citron suggests that the critical question is “which Chief Justice John Roberts will show up. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am
Gerry W. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
The reason is the release of some documents from inside the FBI dealing with Flynn’s original interview by agents from the bureau, back from the period when the Trump administration was just coming into power. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
It is an ugly history, revealing a white supremacist backlash to the growing rights and political power of black people at the end of the nineteenth century. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that “[w]henever the Supreme Court makes a significant change in the law — as it did last week when it overruled its prior approval of nonunanimous juries in state criminal cases” in Ramos v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Here is what Justice Kagan said by way of explanation: [W]e would have to overrule Florida Prepaid if we were to decide this case Allen’s way. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am
” Jess Bravin and Alexa Corse report for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) that “[w]hile Wisconsin voters may have limited impact on the presidential nominations, … the stakes for state and local elections are higher. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 11:48 am
Gerry W. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 9:58 am
What other powers remain untapped? [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Facebook stated, “[W]ith a reduced and remote workforce, we will now rely more on our automated systems to detect and remove violating content and disable accounts. [read post]
