Search for: "Rule v. Rule"
Results 401 - 420
of 185,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2015, 4:04 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:15 pm
Coast Guard published an interim rule [78 FR 13481-13493] with a request for comments to conform regulations to the adopted MARPOL Annex V amendments which entered into force on January 1, 2013. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 12:29 pm
c=gHM The post Bisbing v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 12:29 pm
c=gHM The post Bisbing v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 10:27 am
Bank v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:13 am
The Supreme Court upheld their right to do so in NAACP v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm
The resolution added a new paragraph (viii) to subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of Rule 4.5 to provide for a probationary term for the positions of “University Police Officer 1” and “University Police Officer 1 (Spanish Language)” of not less than 52 weeks nor more than 78 weeks.Adopted in 2010Amendment to Chapter V of Title 4 of NYCRR (Regulations of the Department of Civil Service [President’s Regulations]). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
District Court from Nebraska has ruled that principle announced in Padilla v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:39 pm
See, e.g., Yakus v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
Instead of having motivation to ensure records are maintained correctly, the dissent argues that this ruling allows too great a leeway to encourage any need to correct any defects or problems.The Court seems to leave the decision of the severity of the error, "bookkeeping" v. disregard of Fourth Amendment rights, up to the trial court. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Estate of Capps v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 pm
And now, to conclude, a few thoughts on the theoretical implications of a Supreme Court ruling in Jones v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:17 pm
Specifically, the high court ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 11:54 am
In Pitzer College v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
So were similar decisions striking down rules on the same basis in American Equity v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:59 am
Today the VLW Daily Alert reports that the Virginia Supreme Court has adopted Rules of Evidence, and includes an article that suggests that their adoption is a result of Cynthia Kinser becoming the Chief Justice.It may be evident from some of her opinions (such as the opinion for the Court in Shaheen v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:45 pm
But the Soto case opens forfeited Rule 12 claims to appellate review.The case above is United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
The Court concluded that there was nothing in section 12(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 that could “properly be regarded as weakening in any way the force of the rule in Bonnard v Perryman”. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:21 am
In Lozman v. [read post]
