Search for: "Smith International, Inc." Results 401 - 420 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am by Ben
Keatley claimed that Teranet Inc., the defendant, infringed their rights. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
International Refugee Assistance Project, sending the case back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss it as moot. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:10 am
Last week, in In Re Smith International Inc. (16here) the patent owner and the patent examiner (reexamination) differed as to the proper definition of “body” in the context of a downhole drilling tool. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Cheryl Beise
Functionality and Scope of Protection by edited by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: In re Smith International, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2303, 26 September 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Xiaohong Liu In a decision by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals last week, In re Smith International, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) decision affirming the Examiner’s rejections of some claims in an ex parte reexamination. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:21 pm by Edward Smith
  Volkswagen Fuel Pump Failure Recall I’m Ed Smith, a Fresno car accident lawyer. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
See earlier post on Lucinda Vine and Kristy Pond v PLS Financial Services, Inc. and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Inc., No. 16-50847 (5th Cir. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
" And IB had a non-delegable duty to supervise, detect, and prevent violations of its own internal policies and FINRA rules, and to prevent harm to public investors like the Parkers, as "owners" of the trust account. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:31 am by Andrew Hamm
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC and Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Schachtman
See generally Opposition Brief of Defendants-Appellees Pfizer Inc., Pfizer International LLC, and Greenstone LLC [cited as Pfizer]. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]