Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 401 - 420
of 514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
"); State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
In Caperton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
The injunction was granted by the judge but overturned by the Court of Appeal shortly before broadcast (Chief Constable of Greater Manchester v Channel 5 [2005] EWCA Civ 739). [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:50 am
MCAD v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am
“The Judgment stated : The Supreme Court unanimously grants leave to appeal and then goes on to allow the appeal. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 11 August 2020 the ICO released a statement on the Court of Appeal judgment in R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) stating that “we welcome the Court of Appeal’s judgment that provides clarification on the police use of live facial recognition technology in public places. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:06 am
This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Court of Appeal have granted permission to appeal in the facial recognition technology case of Bridges v Chief Constable of South Wales Police. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
The Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, (heard 3 April 2012 by Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) will be handed down on 19 July 2012. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
N-5, ss. 275, and so soldiers had only the powers of ordinary constables. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
In a Term in which the Court was not considering the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Texas’s redistricting plans, and Arizona’s controversial efforts to regulate immigration, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm
As Lord Chief Justice Camden evocatively stated in Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 State Trials 1030, “the eye cannot by the laws of England be guilty of a trespass”. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
The decision in R (Miller) v (1) The College of Policing, and (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) tackles police recording, retention and dissemination of information about individuals in relation to “non-crime” hate incidents. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection DLA Piper has an article on the state of play of the data-sharing frameworks in the EU and UK. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:59 am
Murphy said repeatedly he didn’t believe the testimony Officer Thomas V. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
