Search for: "United States v. Railroad Company" Results 401 - 420 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
The Order further encourages (i) the Surface Transportation Board to require railroad track owners to provide rights of way to passenger rail and to strengthen their obligations to treat other freight companies fairly, and (ii) the Federal Maritime Commission to ensure vigorous enforcement against shippers charging American exporters exorbitant charges. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am by Alexandra Hamilton
The United States’ court system has a clear hierarchy, and lower courts are obliged to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:30 pm by Deepak Gupta
In fact, then commerce secretary Herbert Hoover said during a Senate hearing, quote, "if the objection appears to be inclusion of workers' contracts in the law's scheme, it might well be amended by states but nothing herein contained shall apply to the contracts of seamen, railroad employees or any other class of workers engaged in interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
· In 1911, the first workers' compensation laws were enacted in the United States on an enduring basis. [read post]
The Project is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and discharges significant quantities of selenium and other pollutants into state and federal wildlife refuges leading into the Delta. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Challoner, 423 U.S. 3 (1975), that when a federal court is making a prediction of state law under Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]