Search for: "Wise v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2007, 8:57 am
Unlike the past few years, which were a little slow cyberlaw-wise, the past 12 months saw a lot of important developments. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
In a recent case, Salvador v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:23 am
The Commission actually claimed that, by setting reduced rates, these Member States acted in breach of their obligations under EU law, ie Article 96 and 98 of the VAT Directive. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:13 pm
[Eric's note: Howard also initially sued Facebook but wisely dropped that complaint as well.] [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Case citation: Davis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
Enter Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:15 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:18 am
See Whittell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:28 am
S. 103, and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:40 am
S., at 606–607 (quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:10 am
” Monterrey Mexican Restaurant of Wise, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
" Griswold v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
The prosecutor in the case of Giles v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
See Also: Wise, David. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:44 pm
Also see David Wise's article "NY Governor, Legislature Ordered to Raise Pay of State Judges. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
See State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
Suing an employee organization for an alleged breach of its duty of fair representationMorton v Mulgrew, 2016 NY Slip Op 07270, Appellate Division, First DepartmentDianna Morton, et al. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
