Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:53 pm
United States, 536 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 9:35 am
The Court held in Knox v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 7:13 am
Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm
The Court’s opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
Here is a brief breakdown of this week's 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Christopher v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
State, 19 N.W.2d 529 (Wis. 1945). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
The Court today (4-1-4) (Justices Alito, Roberts, Kennedy, and Breyer), in Williams v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:14 pm
This is a complicated and [con]tested question of Confrontation Clause law, on which the Court split 5-4 as to the bottom line (which was that the state wins) and 4-1-4 on the rationale.Scalia joined Justice Kagan's dissent on the Confrontation Clause issue, creating an unusual 5-4 lineup with Kagan, Ginsberg, Sotomayor, and Scalia together in dissent. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:54 am
Today the United States Supreme Court held, in Match-E-Be-Nash-She Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
(In one case, Justice Scalia joined the "liberal" justices Kagan, Ginsburg and Sotomayor in dissent.)The result today for church property law is regrettable, because it means that the morass of State court decisions interpreting Jones v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
We had seen this before in some past Confrontation Clause cases, such as Hammon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
” As readers of this Blog are aware, the critical question in Christopher v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:25 am
Here is the Supreme Court’s just released decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
§§636(b)(1)(A)–(B); United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Munaf v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:05 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined Justice Ginsburg’s opinion. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:06 am
Other courts, however, read the concurring opinions by Justices Alito and Sotomayor to stretch much farther - suggesting that any attempt by government to track citizens long-term can only be done with a search warrant.United States v. [read post]
