Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 4221 - 4240 of 30,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
This morning the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-435/12 ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:03 am by Louis Pechman
Payment of overtime is not required for sales managers of banquet facilities, according to a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals in the First Circuit in the case of Leporacci v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm by Russell Engler
From an Access to Justice and Civil Right to Counsel perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision in Turner v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
The blogosphere is filled with rather colorful metaphors and descriptions for what the Oregon Supreme Court was saying to the United States Supreme Court in its recent opinion in Philp Morris v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
  Though I suspect that the history that led up to the adoption of that Constitutional provision -- e.g., our experience with the British -- will shed a fair amount of light on why we don't want the government to have substantial leeway to conduct warrantless searches of people (and their property) that government officers merely suspect are treasonous or enemies of the state. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Relying on United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Then, in Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Kristiina Reed, Six Pump Court
On 2nd November 2015 the Supreme Court heard the case of Regina (Wang Yam) v the Central Criminal Court and Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Zenni states that Aspex had afull and fair opportunity in Altair to litigate infringementof the same patents as to the same products, and thusthat Aspex is collaterally estopped from relitigation. [read post]