Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 4241 - 4260 of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity:… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don’t infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Sarkozy government allegedly caught red-handed infringing DVD copyrights (IP Watch) (IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Court rules that phones ringing in public don't infringe copyright: USA v ASCAP (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Ars Technica) Microsoft asks Federal Circuit to reconsider presumption of patent validity:… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
Costs -- Section 57.105 does not provide mechanism for recovering costs GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P.A., Appellants, v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:38 pm
" In the USA Today, Richard Wolf and David Jackson report here on the ruling that "will allow labor, business and other groups to air "issue ads" that mention candidates by name, a practice banned by a 2002 law"; Barnes has this story in the Washington Post on yesterday's 5-4 decision "providing special interest groups with the opportunity for a far more expansive role in the 2008 elections". [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
  First up is Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
Phard S.p.A., Opposition No. 91172486 [Section 2(d) opposition to ZU ELEMENTS (Stylized) for various paper goods, leather goods, and clothing, in light of various registered and common law marks comprising or containing the mark ELEMENTS for identical goods].July 13- 2 PM: In re Roc USA, LLC , Serial No. 77044525 [refusal to register the mark ROC USA for business management consulting services and for educational services in the field of community development, on the… [read post]
5 Jan 2006, 10:19 am
Bonus links:Here is a link to a PDF file of a Loyola-LA law review article by him, "Revisiting the McCarthy Era: Looking at Wilkinson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am by Cormac Early
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]