Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 21,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2019, 3:27 am
Such was the case in Blue Equity Holdings Kentucky, LLC v Cobalt Riverfront Properties, LLC, No. 2018-CA-001092-MR [Ky Ct App Aug. 30, 2019], in which a parking lot in downtown Louisville, Kentucky was the setting for a ruling by that state’s Court of Appeals in a judicial dissolution proceeding requiring it to construe the purpose clause of an LLC agreement. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 4:33 pm
, 2015 WL 1959935- evidence sufficient to hold shareholder personally liable for a $6 million dollar penalty; State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
– ProQuest https://t.co/PtSVAWlJGx 2019-09-03 A Tale of Two Legal Regimes: An Empirical Investigation into How Copyright Law Shapes Online Service Providers’ Pra… https://t.co/w01YoW2Vw5 2019-09-03 RT @BBCTech: 'Deepfake' app causes fraud and privacy fears in China https://t.co/Ov1haYwxi6 2019-09-04 RT @AnnCavoukian: Fraudsters deepfake CEO's voice to trick manager into transferring $243,000 https://t.co/ADmfKQEZT6 2019-09-04 Google target of new U.S. antitrust… [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 9:23 am
The Oklahoma State Veterinarian stated that “[g]arbage feeding increases the risk of foreign animal disease transmission to the swine industry . . . [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm
MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:06 pm
Genus Lifesciences Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 8:53 am
In Environmental Quality Management Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that an EU trade mark (EUTM) proprietor may bring an infringement action in an EU Member State where advertising or offers for sale are directed or located, in a case concerning alleged infringement of an EUTM in the United Kingdom by a Spanish defendant. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:39 pm
The case is Remington v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
United States, No. 18-1851 C (Ct. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:52 am
On appeal, de Maison's principal argument was that, after Kokesh v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
Landis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:33 am
This Kat is always thinking.On the 1709 blog, Ken Moon discussed the Court of Appeal for the 2nd Circuit's case of Capitol Records v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am
” Coffman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:41 am
In Allergan Sales, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
See e.g., Haley v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 9:52 am
Similarly, by analogy to Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:41 pm
Allergan Sales,2018 WL 3675235, at *7. [read post]
