Search for: "State v. W" Results 4281 - 4300 of 15,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Whitaker, “in which the Fifth Circuit upheld a pre-Heller federal law prohibiting licensed dealers from selling handguns across state lines,” contending that “[w]ith Mance, the court could provide a meaningful framework for evaluating Second Amendment cases without directly affecting any state law. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 1:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
CAH Acquisition Company 10, LLC dba Yadkin Valley Community Hospital, August 15, 2016, Osteen, W., Jr.). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am by Eric P. Robinson
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release  -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am by Eric P. Robinson
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release  -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In a lawsuit brought by a public official alleging defamation, the official must show actual malice on the part of the alleged defamer in order to prevailEastwood v Hoefer, 2016 NY Slip Op 00674, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentKenneth W. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relies on member states; referrals go through national authorities. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:05 am by Susan Brenner
  Specifically, it states that a “court of the United States”, i.e., a federal court, “shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as . . . [read post]