Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 4281 - 4300 of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 6:13 pm
  However, the judge’s version omitted the broader language that opened the government’s proposal: “An enemy combatant is an individual who was part of or supporting forces engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:08 am by Kirk Jenkins
The Circuit Court then certified the question to the Appellate Court of whether the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
United States USA today had a piece “Newsmax apologizes for airing false allegations against Dominion worker, who drops company from suit”. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
The property sat on Trout Point Road, very close to Trout Point Lodge, a hotel that Perret and Leary own and operate. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
Indeed, Openet admits that the Framework described in these marketing materials is the same product that is made and sold in the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Snyder's case was back before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:58 am by Rosalind English
The Court of Appeal thought this would be a step too far; in July last year it ruled that it would be an “unworkable procedure” which amounted to seeking to injunct the government from discussing potentially important information with the government of a state with which the United Kingdom enjoyed friendly In diplomatic relations. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:46 am by Bradley Joondeph
Closely tracking the arguments presented by the United States, the Court found this logic unpersuasive. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm by Schachtman
About three percent of all live births in the United States have a major malformation. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:16 pm
  Every click brings us closer to a cure.The First also explains that a determination under United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:48 am by Editor
iStock_000001565285Medium.jpg In possession with intent to distribute cocaine trial, a person excused for cause as a member of the jury venire was allowed to testify before the jury sworn from that venire; FRE 606(a) is “not applicable to veniremen” and although “a close case” was presented, the defendant failed to “develop[ ] [the] record with evidence of real harm” which might have changed the result, in United States… [read post]