Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 9,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2017, 4:17 am
This comes at the same time the Supreme Court issued a per curiam opinion in White v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 12:10 pm
The question now before the court is whether such challenges should be first filed in federal district courts or instead in federal courts of appeals. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
Therefore, the district court had properly denied the state judge’s motion to dismiss (Anderson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
In 2012, Gruender wrote another majority opinion for the en banc court reversing the district court’s finding that the advisory both unduly burdened abortion rights and violated the First Amendment rights of physicians. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Judge Damon Keith dissented, arguing that the challenge should be brought in district court. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
The district court had found that the statute violated the First Amendment by forcing doctors to speak the state’s message, but the court of appeals, over four dissenting votes, reversed. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
The first, Nelson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
This case presents issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under the California Environmental Quality Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
The substitute trustee's deed showed that American Homes purchased the property in a non-judicial foreclosure sale after Woods defaulted under the terms of the deed of trust. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and then for Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
State Bar v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
State Bar v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:43 am
Cir. 2017) First en banc order of the year: the Federal Circuit will review the following question: Should this court overrule Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:33 am
” Id.(...)Walker first argues that the district court erred inawarding fees without “findings of subjective bad faith”and therefore must be reversed “due to the lack of factualsupport for the [district] court’s conclusions. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
Meet Marriage of Sagonowsky On December 21, 2016, San Francisco based First Appellate District issued a partly published decision in the case of Sagonoswky v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
“no substantial basis” test allows parsing and dismissal of portions of a single claim, and at least one federal district court judge altering the Supreme Judicial Court’s test significantly as applied to anti-SLAPP motions filed in federal court to avoid Seventh Amendment jury right problems.And 2017 already promises to continue the life-of-its-own trend of anti-SLAPP litigation.Be warned, this is a long post.Spoiler Alert: The… [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
“no substantial basis” test allows parsing and dismissal of portions of a single claim, and at least one federal district court judge altering the Supreme Judicial Court’s test significantly as applied to anti-SLAPP motions filed in federal court to avoid Seventh Amendment jury right problems.And 2017 already promises to continue the life-of-its-own trend of anti-SLAPP litigation.Be warned, this is a long post.Spoiler Alert: The… [read post]
