Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 4341 - 4360
of 7,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
Or more likely I’m going to overcommit to other things – committees, blogs, websites, projects that nobody else approves of….I work on the basis that being misunderstood by contemporaries is the mark of true genius (this may be the mark of true foolishness). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
Maybe they’re even humorous most of the time. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm
I’m pleased to announce that Mark Edwards is back for a repeat visit during the month of January. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
I'm kidding. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:08 pm
I’m still doing mourning. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
"He*l, they're all disgruntled. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
I’m sure she was busy. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:14 am
TTAB Reverses 2(d) Refusal of MLOCKER Over "M" Designs for DifferentialsTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Did the Board Reverse? [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
So the fact that you just pointed out--you're right, I'm not going to go out and try to raise taxes on the bottom half of the income ladder. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:50 am
The dominant portion of applicant’s and registrant's marks is the letter M. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:04 pm
As one of my colleagues, New York plaintiff’s lawyer, Mark R. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:19 am
The court shreds UMG’s argument, noting that Veoh did have direct arrangements with music video producers, and UMG’s argument (if you host music, you must know you’re infringing) would negate the entire 512(c) safe harbor. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
Comcast’s first survey first exposed respondents to Comcast’s mark before showing them Fancaster’s mark as well as others. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 as to whether or not estoppel applies. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
Re-immersion in Cold War universe. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
But I think that misses the mark. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
" If I had it to do over I'd have put a question mark on the end of that title, since Texas' economic success is caused by a confluence of factors. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:21 pm
I’m too common to be cured.). [read post]
