Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 7,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 8:25 am
In the Supreme Court case of Wheat v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Picard v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm
Dann v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In Sateriale v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:24 am
P. 26(a)(1)(ii). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Strawn v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:52 am
Marathon Oil Co., 277 P.3d 81, 82 (Wyo. 2012). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:28 am
Anyway, as has happened on many previous occasions, the Kat has been surprised by subsequent case law, this time in the shape of Case C 311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, a Court of Justice (CJEU) Fifth Chamber decision last Thursday, 12 July. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:46 am
E vai mais longe: em Viagem à lua(1650), ele fala de uma nave dividida em várias partes que se queimavam sucessivamente, até situar a cápsula tripulada em órbita. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
However, if we recognize that 5% is not a magic line, then the choice between one tail and two is less important—as long as the choice and its effect on the p-value are made explicit. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm
Since it was handed down late last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
Jou, M.D. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
P.F.V. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Bradshaw, 98 P.3d 1190, 1194-95 (Wash. 2004). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:36 am
A few days ago we read Juris v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
Alternatively, as others have suggested he may be playing the long game, sacrificing a chance to strike down the health care law in order to set new markers on issues including the commerce clause and the spending power. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
This distinction is misguided because many federal exactions have long done both. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:23 am
Excavating v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
The first was that there “is no long history and tradition of strict legislative protection of a text message sent to, displayed, and received from its intended destination, another person's iPhone. [read post]
