Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 35,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2007, 5:11 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:24 pm
The state had its chance. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:25 pm
He simply sat down and waited. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:24 pm
The justices sought the views of the federal government, and, after review, turned down the cases of both Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 10:25 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama's Southern Division handed down a decision on April 20, 2009 in the Vicki V. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court struck down the different requirements on equal protection grounds. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court struck down the different requirements on equal protection grounds. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
It is Lance v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
A hefty judgment was recently handed down by Mellor J concerning a patent for a modified release formulation of mirabegron. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 7:35 pm
Yesterday, I reported on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Reform Michigan Government Now v State of Secretary of State. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:42 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
In Faragher v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Gerson, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down two major, and quickly decided, rulings on January 13, 2022. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm
Last week a three-judge federal court in North Carolina struck down the state’s federal congressional map, ruling that Republicans had drawn the map to give themselves an advantage over Democrats – specifically, the court stressed, to guarantee Republicans’ “domination of the state’s congressional delegation. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:44 pm
The Bush lawyer in Bush v. [read post]
