Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 14,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 3:24 pm
Rabie Cortez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:24 am
In addition, by in effect making the punishment for child rape and murder equivalent, a State that punishes child rape by death may remove a strong incentive for the rapist not to kill the victim. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
This was an important case, building upon some earlier cases, like United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
The conservative movement has been going strong since the 1970s but it is now undergoing a significant process of change. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 1:19 pm
In London Borough of Town Hamlets v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
In Singh v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:16 am
In MF Global Holdings Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:14 am
In the unpublished opinion State of Arizona v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
Guest post by Colleen V. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:21 pm
The case is State of Florida v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:48 am
In a per curiam decision, the Court of Appeals remanded People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
Overlawyered leads us to this line from a Posner opinion in Mirafasihi v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:51 am
Florence v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
In Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
