Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 5,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 8:31 am
United States (1935) and Carter v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 3:35 pm
Rignol is a French national authorized to live and work in the United States on an investor visa. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States… [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 7:46 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Ferreira v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:17 am
United States, 226 U.S. 20, 41 (1912); Allied Tube & 7 Conduit Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
So too do the learned professions, which limit entry into their fields, sometimes in quite blatantly anticompetitive ways [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
The term is connected to a number of other similar terms that seek to give meaning to the same set of practices or states of social being: for example, the German-English Weltanschauung) or perhaps “lifeworlds. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
See Madey v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm
United States, 492 F.3d 1309 (2007), and is sometimes referred to simply as the “Blue & Gold rule. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court case about the presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm
The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 12:29 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am
Like in Shatz, the parties in Kulick formed an LLC, known as SLP, as an investment vehicle—in this case for investment real properties in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
[1] See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:16 am
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:24 am
Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 103-04 (1968), the United States Supreme Court notes: Government in our democracy, state and national, must be neutral in matters of religious theory, doctrine, and practice. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
