Search for: "A. J. Industries, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:16 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., 2013 WL 1191899 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Pa. 2012 Hornak, J.). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Google, Inc., 2007 U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Talk America, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Talk America, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
The profits from his little cottage industry import business helped finance his education. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Countrywide Credit Industry, Inc., 362 F.3d 292 (5th Cir 2004)), Ninth (Horenstein v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
United States, 220 F. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Allen v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Now, in Rivers v Birnbaum 2012 NY Slip Op 06935 Decided on October 17, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Belen, J. the uncertainty is over. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 7:07 am
By Saul Perloff On September 30, 2012, United States District Judge Richard J. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
RUSK STATE HOSPITAL v. [read post]
