Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 421 - 440 of 26,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2021, 2:46 pm
In "SEC Permanently Bars Frivolous Claimant From Whistleblower Program" (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog /  September 15, 2021) http://www.brokeandbroker.com/6062/sec-frivolous-whistleblower/ we reported that the SEC's Claims Review Staff ("CRS") issued Preliminary Determinations recommending the denial of three Whistleblower Awards involving three Notices of Covered Action ("NoCAs") as claimed by the same Claimant. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 1:56 pm by Gregorgy Dell
A New York Federal Court concluded that Anthem did not act arbitrarily or capriciously by terminating benefits to its claimant following his hip replacement surgery when the court found: 1) his treating physician concurred with the reviewing physician’s report that he was not disabled; and 2) the claimant was actively seeking similar employment with other companies. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 5:57 am by Matt Bouchard
  Because the claimants notice in Pepper Burns was actually received 11 days after mailing! [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 2:56 pm by Jonathan Ginsberg
Note that the funds do not go into the deceased claimant's estate - they are payable directly to the spouse or other beneficiary. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Daily Record Staff
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit Administrative Law; Denial of disability benefits: Where vocational expert testified that disability claimant could perform Level 2 jobs, as defined by the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, judgment of the district court, which affirmed Social Security Administration’s denial of claimants benefits, affirmed because, there was no conflict between ... [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:09 am by Jodi Ginsberg
Of course your right to a claimant's IME under Georgia law is not absolute – I recently wrote an article about this topic on one of my web sites. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:12 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Major changes to state law are going to significantly impact Florida personal injury lawsuit claimants – most of them adversely. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:08 pm
The Claimant was actually paid at three different rates: local, prevailing and overtime.On appeal by the Employer, the Board averaged the Claimant's rates. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:15 am by Peter Vodola
As described here and here, the California Court of Appeals last week ruled that court-approved structured settlement factoring transactions could not be challenged by a would-be class action claimant who had alleged that the factoring company, J.G. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
After the Board denied Claimant's application to reopen the matter and reconsider its prior decision, Claimant appealed his disqualification for benefits. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:09 pm
Thus, though it may have technically have been the police's fault that the claimant was handcuffed and taken to jail, it's the claimant's fault she was eligible to be carted off to jail and, therefore, this amounts to "misconduct" for purposes of denying unemployment benefits.The case is Gandy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1]Hedrych recounted claimant's specific job duties over his career for the employer, consistent with claimant's testimony, and summarized his medical findings regarding claimant's limited range of motion, altered sensation, weakness and atrophy, among others. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1]Hedrych recounted claimant's specific job duties over his career for the employer, consistent with claimant's testimony, and summarized his medical findings regarding claimant's limited range of motion, altered sensation, weakness and atrophy, among others. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:51 pm by Medicare Set Aside Services
Unless a reverse offset state, settlement proceeds are prorated over the claimant's life expectancy and the monthly amount used to reduce the SSDI benefit. [read post]
Tesco’s argument was that the most the claimants had was a beneficial interest created or extinguished on transfer, but not acquired or disposed of for the purposes of Schedule 10A. [read post]