Search for: "In Interest of Wilder"
Results 421 - 440
of 645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 5:27 pm
See “Competing Arizona bills target probate courts,” – azcentral.com I’ve previously and repeatedly added my own tuneless sounds to the celestial chorus of plaintive voices crying for reforms in the desert wilderness. [read post]
READER PAUL MUSIC recommends this solar charger for iPhones, cellphones, etc. Well, if you’re antic…
17 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
’ You can now bring your iPhone on a backpacking trip, and assuming you can get a phone signal in the wilderness (a big if, but you often can if you’re on top of a mountain with a clear line of sight to the nearest tower) you can have a device for emergency communication, and that can be used as a GPS locator, and can store maps of the vicinity where you’ll be, not to mention looking up that interesting bug or plant on the web. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:45 am
Thanks to the Stanford Law Review editors for putting together an interesting symposium! [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:45 am
Deeply interesting and highly recommended. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:45 am
Wilder, an Indiana industrialist commanding a brigade in Rosecrans' Union Army of the Cumberland, entered into a interesting contract with his men to buy them Spencer rifles, the best breech-loading infantry weapon available ... [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:29 am
"It sounds like Menell thinks the Federal Circuit got it right with the machine-or-transformation test, and since he was on the same panel at the Stanford symposium with Mark Lemley, whose paper argued against gatekeeping approaches like machine-or-transformation, it would have been interesting to hear their conversation about this. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:44 am
Deeply interesting and highly recommended. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:57 am
“I find it interesting,” U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:51 am
“I find it interesting,” U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:59 pm
According to the recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cal Wilderness v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:38 am
Sky River owns and operates a 77 MW wind facility and has an interest in the Wilderness Line along with several other Qualifying Facilities (QFs). [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:43 am
Wilderness Society v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
In this case Petitioners including The Wilderness Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, California Wilderness Coalition, and many more environmental organizations, combined with Petitioner states including Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Virginia; with Respondents United States Department of Energy and many Respondents-Intervenors including Allegheny Energy, Inc., American Public Power Association, Edison Electric Institute, Monongahela Power Company, and many more … [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm
The Wilderness Society; Prairie Falcon Audubon, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
We can join the News (Jersey and Mexico).I've spent my time crying in the wilderness. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 9:52 pm
Pfeifer's an interesting guy in this context. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
To determine whether putative intervenors demonstrate the 'significantly protectable' interest necessary for intervention of right in a NEPA case, the operative inquiry should be whether the 'interest is protectable under some law' and whether 'there is a relationship between the legally protected interest and the claims at issue.' [citing: Sierra Club, 995 F.2d at 1484]. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
At other times, we have failed to meet our basic responsibility to protect the public interest, leading to disastrous consequences. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The first is in the wilderness, in a remote corner of a large tract of land under the general control of the local authority (which will also consider any planning request). [read post]
