Search for: "In re D. A. S."
Results 421 - 440
of 67,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
" Ces critères sont censés provenir des décisions T198/84 et T279/89. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 8:36 am
Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), along with eight bipartisan co-sponsors, introduced the Master Limited Partnerships Parity Act (S. 2005) in the Senate. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:09 am
Presented for your perusal are three recent TTAB decisions in Section 2(d) appeals. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:53 am
Here are three recent decisions in appeals from Section 2(d) refusals. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:15 pm
La Chambre rétorque que si un mandataire arrive à la conclusion que les Chambres ont pu avoir des exigences plus ou moins strictes, il devrait suivre la décision la plus sévère. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 5:40 pm
D’un autre côté, cependant, la Cour internationale de Justice adopte une approche trop restrictive en matière d’intervention. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:22 pm
Cette décision est également commentée ce jour sur le blog K-s Law, qui nous apprend en outre qu'une autre question est posée à la Grande Chambre, dans le cadre de l'affaire T1068/07, sur le sujet des disclaimers portant sur des objets déjà décrits de manière positive dans la demande telle que déposée. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:17 am
Barrett v Bem (No 2); In re Lavin, decd [2011] EWHC 1247 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 171 “Section 15 of the Wills Act 1837, which made a gift to an attesting witness ‘utterly null and void’, did not extend to a beneficiary of a will who had signed a will on the testator’s behalf at his direction. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In In re Ness Tech., Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:49 am
Contents include:Jean d’Aspremont, The International Law of Statehood and Recognition : A Post-Colonial Invention Antonello Tancredi, Evolution historique des critères de reconnaissance du statut d’Etat à des entités contestées Catherine Maia, Les critères de l’obligation de non-reconnaissance du statut d’Etat à des entités contestées Maurizio Arcari,… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 3:40 am
s Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:46 am
Burch DO Inc., Serial No. 888603134 (August 17, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances S. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:13 am
s Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:22 am
Here are three recent decision in Section 2(d) appeals. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 4:34 am
In re Boulevard West, Inc., Serial No. 87692255 (March 16, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 3:42 am
Greenbaum) [Section 2(d) refusal of PIPPA for "Paper products, namely, stationery, envelopes, printed invitations, announcement cards, note cards, and greeting cards," in view of the registered mark PIPPA & CO. for "Retail store services in the field of party supplies" [& CO. disclaimed].In re Queendom Aesthetics, LLC, Serial No. 88085646 (August 19, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:53 am
Here’s what you need to know about digital transformation and L&D. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
The Court held that a judicial interpretation would trump an agency’s construction only if the judicial precedent “unambiguously foreclose[d] the agency’s interpretation, and therefore contain[ed] no gap for the agency to fill. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:28 am
See any WYHA's here? [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
The National Senior Citizens Law Center's Low-Income Advocate Alert on Medicare Part D, March 2008, is available online at http://www.nsclc.org/areas/medicare-part-d/area_folder.2006-09-28.4596471630. [read post]
