Search for: "Matter of Riley" Results 421 - 440 of 730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2017, 10:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Group of Boston (1995) (application of public accommodations statute violated the First Amendment where it "had the effect of declaring the sponsors' speech itself to be the public accommodation," thus infringing on parade organizers' "autonomy to choose the content of [their] own message"); see also Riley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:13 pm
Supreme Court.While the Supreme Court was considering whether to review the dismissal of Arthur's DNA lawsuit, Alabama Governor Bob Riley ordered a 45-day stay six hours before Arthur's scheduled execution on September 27. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
‘Under a de novo review, the court considers the matter anew and freely substitutes its own judgment’ for that of the lower tribunal. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Chuck Cosson
  Justice Stevens cites two findings of the District Court: 1) that, at the time of trial, existing technology did not include any effective method for a sender to prevent minors from obtaining access to communications on the Internet without also denying access to adults;[6] 2) there are at least four “special attributes of Internet communication”[7] – all of which point towards far more open access to mass communications, and towards more democratic distribution of such… [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
`The essential question in an overbreadth challenge is the closeness of the fit between the legitimate purpose of the restriction and the burden it imposes on the defendant's constitutional rights—bearing in mind, of course, that perfection in such matters is impossible, and that practical necessity will justify some infringement. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:06 am by Jolynn Dellinger, Stephanie Pell
Only a few short years after Griswold, the Supreme Court extended the right to use contraception to unmarried women, explaining that “[i]f the right to privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The Twitter exchange between Riley and Rose is available here. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:12 am
. * * * In separate memorandums to the court, attorneys representing Tippecanoe County Sheriff Tracy Brown and prosecutor Pat Harrington argued that it is a matter of the public's safety versus that of an individual. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:36 pm
Also complicating matters is that in all of these cases, the government ultimately won on the good-faith exception. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 12:49 pm by NBlack
” Finally the Court reiterated the Supreme Court’s 2014 determination in Riley v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:17 am
If you have any further questions about this matter, please don't hesitate to contact me. [read post]