Search for: "PETERS v. US "
Results 421 - 440
of 5,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 12:39 pm
HNT-L-649-09; Peter A. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:50 am
The judge at the trial level relied on another appellate case, PJG v PSS. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
The literature on this question is deep, but for those interested in taking a dive, there are three useful articles (by Dawn Johnsen, David Barron, and Peter Strauss) published in Law & Contemporary Problems in 2000, and there have been good more recent contributions to the debate by Professors Daniel Meltzer, Saikrishna Prakash, and Joseph Landau. [read post]
22 May 2007, 5:15 am
Peter M. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 6:03 am
Shareholder activism is often thought of in binary terms: activist v. company, dissident nominees v. company directors. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 11:05 am
United States, Dirks v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:29 pm
Naturally, it is prudent to clearly specify when the survivorship period is triggered or else litigation can arise as to the interpretation of the survivorship clause.In Burkett v Capovilla (2003) 112 CA4th 1444, Erma unfortunately used a paralegal service to write her trust in 1998 (never a good idea). [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 6:48 am
A recent Massachusetts federal court decision, Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:44 am
BielLittle Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:54 pm
The case is Peters v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:20 am
In Prostyakov v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:50 pm
ShareWednesday’s argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
Social media has been used this way before during other ‘crisis events,’ For example, in the aftermath of the 2011 riots, in R v Blackshaw [2011] EWCA Crim 2312 evidence was presented that suggested that social media was used to coordinate the public disorder that spread across the UK. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Two Guantanamo-related cases set dates for oral argument: Al Janko v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:35 am
SeeDobson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm
If its effects are much the same as those classically understood for proprietary estoppel, why use it? [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:07 pm
Thirdly, and most importantly, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the parens patriae power may be used to order medical examinations where there is otherwise a legislative gap. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:00 pm
Full (German) version: Peter Hilpold, Maßnahmen zur effektiven Durchsetzung von Menschen- und Arbeitsrechten: Völkerechtliche Anforderungen, in: August Reinisch, Stephan Hobe, Eva-Maria Kieninger & Anne Peters (eds), Unternehmensverantwortung und Internationales Recht, C.F. [read post]
