Search for: "People v Davis"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
Davis v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
Sir David Davis MP has tabled a number of far reaching amendments [pdf] to the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill [pdf] which returns to the House of Commons for its Committee Stage on 8 May 2024. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 12:34 pm
appeared first on Drake, Hileman & Davis, PC. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm
Davis, the Equal Protection Clause, as in Plessy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:39 pm
For that reason, Noah Feldman has to line up with Jefferson Davis, in opposition to Lincoln. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
Natapoff also has an excellent, and timely, post about the Troy Davis case, which I talked about yesterday: seems one of the recanting witnesses against Davis was a jailhouse informant who testified that Davis had confessed the crime to him. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 8:53 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 8:01 am
And earlier this year, on February 13, 2020, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals essentially made the same finding in Diamond v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
--in the context of the Confrontation Clause, a fact "potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution," Davis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Four days later Cowin hand-delivered his letter of resignation to Karen Davis, DCJS's Director of Human Resources Management, [Davis], in which Cowin stated that his last day of work would be July 30, 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:40 pm
It is more of a question in cases where DNA evidence has nothing to do with the crime, such as in drug cases or property crimes.The case before the Supreme Court is Maryland v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 4:15 am
(People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 5:53 am
Consequently, they are unconstitutional under the framework established by the Supreme Court in Arlington Heights v. [read post]
