Search for: "People v J." Results 421 - 440 of 7,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
 The English courts have referred to this mechanism both in the High Court (Floyd J's dicta in Nokia v IPCom) and Birss J when he was sitting in the Patents County Court in relation to copyright cases: "In cases like this the preliminary issue being decided is on a tangible basis. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Le Grand, 67 A.D.2d 446 (2d Dep’t 1979) (Titone, J.); People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
  The approach to determining meaning, was expanded by Nicklin J in Koutsogiannis v Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB); [2020] 4 W.L.R. 25 at [12], later endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Millett v Corbyn [2021] EWCA Civ 567; [2021] E.M.L.R. 19 at [8]. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm by NARF
News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html This week, in brief: Muscogee Nation citizen Lauren J. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
” And here is the parallel that Thomas J. finds between traditional common carriers and modern tech companies: “a traditional telephone company laid physical wires to create a network connecting people. [read post]