Search for: "People v. Standard (1986)" Results 421 - 440 of 645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2012, 8:46 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Supreme Court considered the matter in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:48 pm by Peter Tillers
NORTHERN IRELAND LAW QUARTERLY THE VALUE OF EVIDENCE IN LAW Peter Tillers                 Vol. 39 No. 2                                           Summer 1988 THE VALUE OF EVIDENCE IN LAW* … [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
The Federal crime of Money Laundering is traditionally understood to be the practice of filtering “dirty” money, or ill-gotten gains, through a series of transactions until the funds are “clean,” or appear to be proceeds from legal activities. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007),  an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am by Ronald Collins
White, “The Burkean Justice,” The Weekly Standard, July 18, 2011). [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am by Ronald Collins
White, “The Burkean Justice,” The Weekly Standard, July 18, 2011). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:34 am by Steve Hall
” Earlier coverage of Marcus Druery's case begins at the link The Supreme Court established standards to assess whether severely mentally ill inmates are competent to be executed in a 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by P.J. Blount
The United States, 536 FSupp 1355 (1986). 5 E. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On Monday 18 June 2012 the trial of Luke Cooper v Evening Standard and Associated Newspapers will begin before Eady J and a jury. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:23 am by Erica Newland
(Of course, it’s not like reading vague and legalistic privacy policies actually gives most people that much usable information about what companies do with their data anyway!) [read post]