Search for: "SMITH v. STATE OF MAINE" Results 421 - 440 of 720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2013, 11:52 am by Hanni Fakhoury
  With these privacy concerns in mind, last week we filed an amicus brief in the Connecticut Appellate Court in State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Court, however, in a 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm by Jason Shinn
Instead, in 1998, the United States Supreme Court confirmed that the main federal anti-discrimination law (Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
For example, the Military Commissions Act of 2009,1 which completely overhauled the Guantánamo Bay military commissions, was passed as Title XVIII of the 2010 NDAA.2 Likewise, the 2011–2013 NDAAs’ detention provisions—the main subject of this book—generated far more controversy and attention than the surrounding thousands of pages of appropriations provisions. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
Wednesday 8 May 2013, State Opening of Parliament – start of the new session of the parliament. 11.30am Queen’s Speech – Outline of the Government’s policies and proposed legislative programme for the new session. 3.30pm Motion for Humble Address – Debate on the Queen’s Speech, Main Chamber, House of Lords. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm by hls
10:30 Welcoming Remarks by Dean Minow 10:33 Alex Smith- symposium coordinator thanking everyone who put work into today. 10:35- room is almost full, so great to see so many people showing support! [read post]