Search for: "Short Way Lines v. Thomas" Results 421 - 440 of 567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In short, the court concluded that the FDA would never view the relevant regulations in the same way that the plaintiff in Kemp had twisted them in search of something to call a violation.By misconstruing FDA requirements, the violation claims in Kemp in reality would have imposed requirements that differed from those of the FDA. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Geoffrey Lin (Hogan Lovells) described his personal involvement with the Chint v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
” That’s a little line which should find its way into some appellate briefs. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:26 am by SHG
“It is plausible,” Judge Thomas M. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
  The bad news is that just about everything short of that will. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
Looking For A ShortcutDear Shortcut:The short answers are “Yes”, “No”, and “Are you kidding me? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
Proof of Life’s screenplay was partly inspired by Thomas Hargrove’s book The Long March to Freedom, which recounts how the release of the once-kidnapped Hargrove was negotiated by Thomas Clayton, the founder of his eponymous kidnap-for-ransom consultancy Clayton Consultants (now part of risk management firm, Triple Canopy). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
”  Both Barnett and Whittington build their theories on a foundation of “original public meaning,” but they extend the moves made by Scalia and Lawson in a variety of interesting ways. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The current Supreme Court has at least three members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
”  Both Barnett and Whittington build their theories on a foundation of “original public meaning,” but they extend the moves made by Scalia and Lawson in a variety of interesting ways. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
The rest of the returning relists (and the one rescheduled case we deign to acknowledge) involve fallout from the Court being short one Justice. [read post]