Search for: "State v. Nichols" Results 421 - 440 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Emma Kent
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Rosalind English
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence  on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1)  (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170   (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy  (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in  Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Today it is recognised across the common law world that a claim for restitution founded on unjust enrichment is founded neither on consent nor on wrongdoing (see for example Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale and Kleinwort Benson v Birmingham City Council). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
Nichols, 4276, 5177/03, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 7780; 55 A.D.3d 380; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
Himmelreich); a challenge to a requirement that an American convicted of sex crimes must update his registration as an offender in a U.S. state after he has moved abroad (Nichols v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:57 am
 As for your question, the standard of review is best described by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
  State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
The interpretation of fairness clearly lies within the eye of the beholder, as noted by Lord Nicholls in White v White [2000] UKHL 54 and this concept is where the case law will now develop. [read post]