Search for: "Thomas v. Held"
Results 421 - 440
of 7,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2017, 2:07 pm
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:02 pm
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:32 am
Thomas contains all briefing. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
The entire Court held that “The certification of the plaintiff class was not consistent with Rule 23(a). [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:27 am
Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:27 am
Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
As almost all Americans who have ever watched television or gone to a movie know, the Supreme Court held in a case called Miranda v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:01 am
SEB S.A. (2011) Download Global-Tech v SEBMajority: Alito (author), Roberts, C.J., Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
But in a later case, CAAF disagreed with NMCCA’s Thomas opinion and held that a PTA provision waiving the right to request clemency or parole violates R.C.M. 705(c)(1)(B). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court case Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:03 am
In a unanimous opinion, written by Justice Thomas, the Supreme Court has held that the addition of a generic computer to an abstract idea does not render that idea patent–eligible. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:47 am
Jammie Thomas-Rassett, a case involving illegal music downloads of 24 songs was held. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Miller, which addressed police access to business records held by third parties; Smith v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:40 am
In a July 2, 2024 decision, the Supreme Court reversed the trial court, which had relied on a 2014 court of appeals decision entitled Thoma v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:32 pm
The Court held that the statute required the EPA to disburse all of the funds and did not permit the impoundment of some part of the money. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:24 pm
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
