Search for: "US v. Strange"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:51 pm
Crazy, again, to use the full name of the victim but use initials for the person ultimately found to have committed the abuse.Plus, the decision here is sort of strange because when the opinion was initially rendered, it was unpublished, but used Nicole's full last name, both in the caption and in the text. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:17 am
United StatesWashington Post v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:21 am
I don't know about you, but this kind of light alone makes me nervousState v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
Are there alternative forms of relief for COVID-19 that could be used in the absence of force majeure? [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
What she demonstrates is that constitutional politics sometimes makes for strange bedfellows. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:53 am
Williams' decision yesterday in NuStar Farms, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:47 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
Article 37 of the UCMJ prohibits such commanders from using their rank and position to unduly influence the course of the trial, the witnesses or the accused, the judge or panel members, and the prosecutor and defense counsel. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
It will be a strange day in a stranger world, when a jury summons arrives in the mail with a copy of the Manual! [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
His proposed resolution, which also has not yet been formally introduced, would temporarily allow for an expanded use of both proxy voting and remote hearings. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
In this regard, it is the article 23 ‘restrictions’ clause which is the most central, although strangely this is not acknowledged or even mentioned in GC et al itself. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:44 pm
MacKenzie v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:07 am
") The use of the term "damage" in every one of those clauses amplifies my desire to just call the offense "criminal damage. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
This brings us to the so-called “faithless,” or “anomalous,” electors in the two cases at hand: Chiafalo v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:28 am
” However, Gorsuch explained, it “turns out that the Sixth Amendment’s otherwise simple story took a strange turn” with the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:24 pm
Happily, the Court of International Trade has given us another chapter in the Home Depot USA Inc v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 2:50 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
