Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 421 - 440 of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The Court rejected Bloomberg’s appeal and upheld the decision of Mr Justice Nicklin, who awarded £25,000 for misuse of private information to ZXC, as well as the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
  In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:29 pm
Want to see a bunch of top appellate lawyers (many SoCal-ers as well as two former Cal Supreme Court Justices) take on the President, by analogizing current events to Nazi Germany? [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:15 am by Walter Olson
Tags: attorneys' fees, EEOC, Supreme Court, WO writings CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  We discussed three significant cases from the 2013-2014 Supreme Court term: McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by MBettman
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)(“well into the 20th century, [the court’s] Fourth Amendment jurisprudence was tied to common-law trespass. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:47 pm by Ronald Mann
The Supreme Court’s most important case on the topic is the 2014 decision in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court announced one of the most important decisions* in the modern history of criminal procedure, Teague v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 2:45 pm
Ken's article is a comprehensive annotated guide to high court opinions, scholarship and commentary regarding the themes addressed by the Supreme Court in Lafler and Frye as well as their implications for the administration of criminal justice. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by Amy Howe
American Humanist Association, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 1:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
At para 70, the Court cited its decision in R. v. [read post]