Search for: "Wiley v. Wiley"
Results 421 - 440
of 840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
John Shepard Wiley, Jr. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 11-697 (U.S. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:25 am
Wiley as an “unpredictable” change in the copyright discourse since the 2010 CPP report. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:20 am
McCullough v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:57 pm
Bert Rein, a seasoned litigator and co-founder of the law firm Wiley Rein LLP, argued his first two cases before the Supreme Court during OT12 and also argued two of the biggest cases of the Term, Fisher v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am
Other coverage focused on Boyer v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:02 pm
V. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court, having reversed the Second Circuit's decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:15 pm
The recent Supreme Court decision, Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Turow, who is currently President of the Authors Guild, took to The Times to criticize the Supreme Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:45 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
In Costco v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:37 pm
Weslow (Wiley Rein) filled in some of the horrific detail of the possible costs that might be incurred by trade mark owners in seeking to have their marks registered for clearinghouse purposes. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:04 am
In the Supreme Court’s Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
John Wiley & Sons – U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:13 am
Last week the US Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited decision in Kirtsaeng v Wiley (IPKat report with background to the case here). [read post]