Search for: "Windsor v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm
Since the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Question: Chapter three in your book is titled “Empathy for the Devil: Justice Antonin Scalia – Dissenting, Windsor v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:30 am
By Rich McHugh In April, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Notice 2014-19, which provided additional guidance addressing the impact on tax-qualified retirement plans of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
Windsor in 2013 may have been linked to his conservative vote to strike down the ACA’s individual mandate in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:45 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
And United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Vance v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:36 am
As illustrated by Justice Kennedy’s recent majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
This Article disagrees with both positions and argues that the new Supreme Court Equal Protection jurisprudence as reflected in cases such as United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
By Matthew Skurnik Since the Supreme Court’s June 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:50 am
State Tax Law in a Post-Windsor World, 47 Creighton L. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
Windsor. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) issued guidance addressing the treatment of same-sex spouses under the HIPAA Privacy Rule in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The IPKat’s friends at C5 have put together a big conference on Trade Mark Litigation, on 29 and 30 January 2015 at the Royal Windsor Hotel, Brussels. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm
” Understandably, news stories and legal commentary about this case highlight the court’s consciously departing from other post-Windsor federal courts to rule that Baker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
About Windsor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
The decision was a clear break with the near-unanimous results of federal trial and appeals courts in the wake of the Justices’ ruling last year in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:47 pm
Nelson in 1972, a view that has been rejected by every other federal court since United States v. [read post]
