Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Even in those trials nominally organized around the IMT paradigm of aggressive war, such as the High Command case (No. 12), crimes against humanity and acts of atrocity came to dominate the prosecutors’ case.[13] This is not suggest that Heller overlooks the NMT’s contributions to the atrocity paradigm. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, Connor H. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:03 am
There is no dominant or unified league that mandates or regulates the eSports industry. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
Think of what the state bars could do if they pooled their resources. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
In 2010, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act (“UCLA”) was made available to state legislatures, effectively ending the debate. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
The standard does not require that the impugned law be the only or the dominant cause of the prejudice suffered by the claimant. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Barasch v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
The lack of clear guidance does however mean that viable claims are frequently rejected out of hand for apparently encompassing statutory excluded subject-matter, especially since “non-technical” features may actually form a dominating part of a claim. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
Circuit’s subsequent decision in Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
Siemenski: we don’t really know because there are too few cases, because of the great imbalance of power between those sending the notices and those receiving them—big corporations v. individual users.Coble for Bridy: should Congress create incentives for voluntary systems to address infringement, and if so what? [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
